My approach to pottery transformed profoundly after this. I decided to let my cutaneous feedback be the primary source of input and let vision take a shotgun seat.
Being entirely present with clay, through my sense of touch, mindfully taking cues from this beautiful, porous object of the earth was the most crucial tool to my evolution as a true potter.
Honing cutaneous feedback became the next step. Clay is willing to have conversations with anyone who lays their fingers on it, subject to ‘touch’ being the mode of communication. Could you ever imagine ‘touch’ taking the driver’s seat in perceiving everyday things in our world, to then further allow us to inform our actions?
Clay’s properties change and transform, giving it a new character and personality at different points along its life journey; be it in its naturally found state, when it is in the process of being made into something or even after it has been made into something and fired to last.
The relationship between a potter and clay, in my eyes today, is like that of two partners sitting together to intentionally arrive at a beautiful new creation through dialogue, deliberation, adaptation and collaboration. Staying attuned to one another through this conversation and journey is key! How thirsty is my clay getting as I am working it? How much water will satiate its thirst, and how much could lead to it collapsing? With what force does it need to be pinched, and how much clay will be displaced by it? Will my creation stay tall or wriggle and fall owing to uneven distribution of clay? Should I communicate with my little finger or my thumb–how gentle or firm a nudge does my clay need? There are innumerable cues that clay gives a potter to inform their actions. When a potter does not listen and adjust based on prompts from clay or recognise clay’s presence and autonomy, the process of making will not attain the progressive and open-ended character typical of a dialogue in creation.